We hear sounds over a huge frequency
range of about 20Hz to 20,000Hz, although this range diminishes as we age. It has
long been recognised that identifying the direction of a sound source (or 'localizing' it)
requires a vast amount of neural processing. For accurate localization, we require the
neural computation of a variety of cues. When a sound comes from one side of us, say
the right, it arrives first at the right ear and is also louder in that ear. At low
frequencies, the brain processes differences in the time of arrival of the sound at each
ear. At higher frequencies, the important cue is the difference in loudness perceived by
each ear. The final main piece of information is
the way that our ears modify sounds - amplifying some frequencies and diminishing others -
as they pass over the convolutions of the pinna. This is called the head-related transfer
function (HRTF) and the HRTF of any one person is unique to that individual.
The role of the HRTF is particularly important
when we are trying to determine whether a sound comes from directly behind or in front of
us. In such a case, the differences in timing and loudness at each ear are
negligible and there is consequently very little information on which we can base a
decision. Each type of sound localization cue
operates over a different and relatively narrow frequency range. Information from
all cues is combined by our brains to provide us with a sense of where a sound is coming
from. Only certain types of sound are easy to
localize and the crucial component is that they contain a large spectrum of frequencies
i.e. broadband noise. (It can most easily be described as the Sound of a
rushing river or waterfall.) With broadband noise, the brain has the maximum number
of cues available to process. Pure tones, simple tone combinations or narrowband noise
cannot be localized. In one example of research at Leeds University it was shown that the sound of conventional police, fire and ambulance sirens is particularly difficult to localize. In laboratory tests involving some 200 drivers, 56 per cent (worse than a random guess) were unable to tell whether the sound of an approaching siren was directly behind or in front of them - a potentially dangerous situation if they were at the wheel of a real car.
|
|
|
| © QED Intellectual Property Limited 2008-2010 - All rights reserved - Terms of use | ||